Hunts Point Tomato Co. v. United States Department of Agriculture

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Idaho law and reversing district court holding that action was outside scope of employment because it violated company policy
• “The issue of 11 whether an employee acted within the scope of employment is a factual question to be decided by 12 the trier of fact, but conduct that is clearly outside the scope of employment may be decided by 13 the court as a matter of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).