Huntley v. Reed

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, in Grammer v. Wiggins-Meyer Steamship Co., 126 Or 694, 703, 270 P 759 (1928
• holding new trial required after judge's ex parte communication with jury in response to jury question during deliberations because there was \no way of reaching a conclusion about what transpired other than by adopting the judge's recollection\
• holding new trial required after judge’s ex parte communication with jury in response to jury question during deliberations because there was “no way of reaching a conclusion about what transpired other than by adopting the judge’s recollection”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).