Huntley v. Law Office of Richard Clark, PLLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “courts should not simply 11 accept a party’s argument that consent requires individualized inquiries without 12 evidence demonstrating consent is, in fact, an individualized issue.”
• finding no predominance of common issues under Rule 23(b)(3) where class members’ debts “arose in different contexts” requiring “extensive individual inquiries” to determine whether class members provided their cell phone numbers to the creditor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).