Huntington v. Love

Citations

• 56 Wash. 674
• 106 P. 185
• 1910 Wash. LEXIS 870

Syllabus

<p>Appeal — Review—Trial De Novo — Ebboe Aíleged by Respondents. In an equity case tried de novo on appeal, the respondent, having taken exception to findings, is entitled, without having taken a cross-appeal, to have the erroneous findings reviewed and corrected, and the judgment affirmed, if supported by the evidence or right on any ground, although based upon erroneous findings.</p> <p>Insanity — Evidence—Sufficiency. The evidence is insufficient to show that one who had been an inmate of an insane asylum for a few months, and at times somewhat deranged, was insane, where it appears that for over three years before the commencement of the action, she had held a responsible position of trust as a housekeeper, and witnesses testified to her complete sanity during such time.</p>