Skip to main content
· 8/20/2013

Huntington National Bank v. Richardson Ex Rel. Estate of Cyberco Holdings, Inc.

Citations

  • 734 F.3d 432
  • 70 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 30
  • 2013 WL 4417515
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 17263
  • 58 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 92

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the concept of substantive consolidation and concluding that an order denying such a request is not a final appealable order
  • explaining the BAP’s dismissal of the appeal “fully resolved the appellate proceedings by deciding the jurisdictional question and left nothing for the bankruptcy court to do”
  • “Our cases have not discussed the concept at length or prescribed factors to consider when it is to be applied, but we have recognized the procedure without criticism.”
  • no federal right of action under URA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook, Stranch, Lawson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.