Hunter v. Werner Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence of prior lawsuits involving similar allegations of side rail fracture, combined with other evidence, created genuine issue of material fact over whether defendant had sufficient knowledge requiring it to issue warning to customers
• the trial court’s discretion “to decide whether it will consider affidavits not served within the time limits contemplated by the statutes ... is consistent with the Civil Practice Act’s intent to promote justice and not to obstruct the administration of justice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).