Skip to main content
· 3/8/1974

Hunter v. Swenson

Citations

  • 372 F. Supp. 287
  • 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9615

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • expressing doubt that actual compulsion is required to invalidate a confession but finding it unnecessary to decide the question
  • stating in dicta that Fifth Amendment prohibits confessions \compelled\ by promises of leniency
  • “[N]one of the injuries [plaintiff] alleges can be redressed by a favorable 6 RCRA decision” where “[plaintiff] no longer has an interest in the [premises].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Collinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.