· 3/8/1974
Hunter v. Swenson
Citations
- 372 F. Supp. 287
- 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9615
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- expressing doubt that actual compulsion is required to invalidate a confession but finding it unnecessary to decide the question
- stating in dicta that Fifth Amendment prohibits confessions \compelled\ by promises of leniency
- “[N]one of the injuries [plaintiff] alleges can be redressed by a favorable 6 RCRA decision” where “[plaintiff] no longer has an interest in the [premises].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Collinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.