Hunter v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing grant of habeas relief, finding that \[m]uch of the evidence\— witness's memory loss and potentially conflicting testimony of witnesses—\is not new and reliable\
• defining “new” evidence as evidence that' “was not available at trial and could not have been discovered through the exercise of due diligence”
• reversing grant of habeas relief, finding that “[m]uch of the evidence”—witness’s memory loss and potentially conflicting testimony of witnesses—“is not new and reliable”
• evidence must be “so forceful that it is more likely than not that no reasonable [trier of fact] would have convicted [defendant] in the light of the new evidence”
• facts of which defendant was aware at trial, and to which defendant could have testified, are not new evidence
• evidence must be \so forceful that it is more likely than not that no reasonable [trier of fact] would have convicted [defendant] in the light of the new evidence\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).