Hunter v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evi-dence of res gestae is proper provided it can be established by competent means, sanctioned by law, and afford any fair presumption or inference as to the question in dispute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Porter v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2003-06-25· cited 4×
• Hart v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1999-03-24

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brunson v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-05-05· cited 73×
• Marts v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1998-04-23· cited 58×
• State v. Long
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1992-12-07· cited 26×
• Turner v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1997-12-17· cited 12×
• Harper v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1986-04-09· cited 9×
• Stewart v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1997-10-15· cited 8×
• McCoy v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1980-09-08· cited 7×
• Warren v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1997-11-05· cited 6×