Hunter v. Sprint Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that potential class members’ legal claims differed because some may have been misclassified under the FLSA (liability) while others were only challenging the amount of back pay owed (damages)
• approving start date for class period of three years before the filing of the complaint
• approving start date for class period of three years before the filing of the complaint
• “Despite their confusing semantic similarities, the differences between class actions and collective actions are great.”
• ordering production of names and addresses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).