Skip to main content
· 3/2/1923

Hunter v. School Committee of Cambridge

Citations

  • 244 Mass. 296
  • 138 N.E. 382

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the single-subject requirement serves the beneficent purpose of making each legislative proposal dependent upon its own merits for passage
  • holding that the single-subject requirement serves the beneficent purpose of making each legislative proposal dependent upon its own merits for passage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Courcy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.