Hunter v. Options Unlimited Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the negative implication of Congress’s provision for enforcement by the Attorney General is that the statute does not permit private rights of action
• “The district court correctly determined that the Eleventh Amendment permits prospective injunctive relief, but not damage awards, for suits against individuals in their official capacities under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).