Skip to main content
· 3/5/1895

Hunter v. Newman

Citations

  • 52 Ohio St. (N.S.) 659

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We conclude, though, that because the 2002 petition is a ‘second or 3 successive’ petition that Burton did not seek or obtain authorization to file in the District Court, 4 the District Court never had jurisdiction to consider it in the first place.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.