Skip to main content
· 4/11/1989

Hunter v. Mitek Industries

Citations

  • 721 F. Supp. 1102
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5185
  • 1989 WL 120356

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declaring that “[f]air value means on-going business value, and a dissenting shareholder is entitled to his proportional or pro-rata share of the company’s on-going value”
  • \the purpose of the appraisal statute is to award the dissenter the value of what he owned\ before a significant corporate change
  • “the purpose of the appraisal statute is to award the dissenter the value of what he owned” before a significant corporate change

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hungate

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.