Hunter v. Magack (In Re Magack)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that application of a civil contempt standard to action brought under § 727(a)(6)(A) is proper, rather than making finding of intent or wilfulness
• stating that application of a civil contempt standard to action brought under § 727(a)(6)(A) is proper, rather than making finding of intent or wilfulness
• stating, “impossibility or an inability to comply with a judicial order is a valid defense to a charge of civil contempt”
• civil contempt standard, which does not require proof of intent, applies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).