District Court of Appeal of Florida· 5/26/2010
Hunter v. Hunter
Citations
- 36 So. 3d 148
- 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7332
- 2010 WL 2077158
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that injunctions that do not comply with rule 1.610 in .dissolution proceedings require .reversal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wallace, Khouzam, Crenshaw
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Smith v. KnightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-09-11· cited 13×
- FLA. HIGH SCHOOL ACTIVITIES v. BenitezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-30· cited 13×
- Hathcock v. HathcockDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-09-29· cited 11×
- ORMOND BEACH v. Daytona BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-07-20· cited 9×
- City of Boca Raton v. Boca Raton Airport Auth.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-09-20· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.