Hunter v. Haney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that incorporating an analogous set of rules, the AAA “Employment Arbitration Rules,” constitutes a clear and unmistakable delegation of arbitrability
• concluding issue of whether parties’ agreement permitted classwide arbitration was for arbitrator to decide
• discussing the Third and Sixth Circuits’ treatment of class action arbitrability and disagreeing with their reasoning
• acknowledging the consensus among “many circuits” but assuming the issue and concluding that the parties clearly and unmistakably delegated the issue to an arbitrator
• considering the same AAA rule at issue here and holding that it, together with broad language like that in MAA 1, showed a clear and unmistakable intent to delegate arbitrability to the arbitrator
• “[W]hen contracting parties incorporate the AAA rules into a broad arbitration agreement, as was the case here, such an incorporation clearly and unmistakably evinces their intent to arbitrate arbitrability.” (citing Belnap, 844 F.3d at 1281

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).