Hunter v. Dennies Contracting Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that motion to dissolve temporary injunction required party to show change of circumstances and, absent such proof, denial of motion would not be abuse of discretion
• affirming lower court’s refusal to dissolve or modify injunction after noticed hearing because motion “merely sought to have the judge reconsider his initial ruling,” and movant failed to prove change in circumstances
• declining to consider the sufficiency of the evidence presented at a hearing that resulted in the entry of an unappealed order for a temporary injunction on an appeal from a subsequent order denying a motion to dissolve or modify the temporary injunction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).