Hunter v. Cordon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, a protected property right to a license existed where both federal and state law entitled the applicant to a license whenever certain statutory requirements were met
• “[T]he State is not a ‘person’ for 1 || purposes of § 1983.”
• “[T]he State is not a ‘person’ for 28 purposes of § 1983.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).