· 9/15/2009
Hunter v. Clinton
Citations
- 653 F. Supp. 2d 115
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84019
- 93 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,792
- 2009 WL 2926775
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that plaintiff’s complaints of increased scrutiny were not an adverse employment action for the purposes of discrimination or retaliation and noting that these allegations were akin to a poor performance evaluation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Paul L. Friedman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.