Hunter v. Chiles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “This Court concludes that there is not a rational basis to provide speech to one who is twenty years three hundred sixty-four days and deny the same to one who is two days older.”
• “The Court finds that Florida made the voluntary choice to provide optional home health care, including durable medi cal equipment, to the Plaintiffs. The Court concludes that the ACDS is durable medical equipment and covered as a Florida Medicaid benefit under the home health care provision.”
• requiring coverage of speech generating devices as DME

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).