Skip to main content
· 10/26/1988

Hunter Mining Laboratories, Inc. v. Management Assistance, Inc.

Citations

  • 763 P.2d 350
  • 104 Nev. 568
  • 1988 Nev. LEXIS 94

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an agency relationship does not exist 14 “every time one party has a contractual right to control some aspect of another party’s 15 business”
  • \Only when a manufacturer controls the day to day or operative details of the dealer's business is an agency potentially created.\
  • “Only when a manufacturer controls the day to day or operative details of the dealer’s business is an agency 19 potentially created.”
  • “In an agency relationship, the principal possesses the right to control the agent's conduct.”
  • “In an agency relationship, the principal possesses the right to control the agent’s conduct.”
  • computer dealers were not the agents of the computer manufacturer as was required to hold the manufacturer hable for the dealer’s breach of contracts with the computer buyer because the manufacturer did not control the day to day operative details of the dealer’s businesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.