HUNTAIR, INC. v. Gladstone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Rule 9(b) standard is somewhat relaxed when a claim rests on an alleged fraudulent omission because “a plaintiff cannot plead either the specific time of [an] omission or the place, as he is not alleging an act, but a failure to act”
• finding continuity where the record provided no indication that the alleged scheme would have stopped had the employee not been terminated
• applying Rule 9(b) to claim for intentional interference with prospective economic relations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).