· 9/1/1993
Hunt v. U.S. Department of Justice
Citations
- 2 F.3d 96
- 1993 WL 331283
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- state forfeiture proceedings did not preclude Rule 41(e) proceeding where proceedings could not provide recovery of seized property
- “court may deny Rule 41(e) motion where an adequate remedy at law exists”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reavley, Duhé, Barksdale
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.