· 1/8/2014
Hunt v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Citations
- 408 U.S. App. D.C. 34
- 739 F.3d 706
- 2014 WL 59978
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 332
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “since plaintiff has not identified an agency record subject to testing for accuracy, the Court must deny his motion for summary judgment because he has not proffered any probative evidence of a Privacy Act violation”
- Privacy Act claim for damages was barred from judicial review because the claims were \based on the assertion 'that the VA's failure to maintain accurate and complete records adversely affected [a veteran's] benefits determinations.' \
- “The district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over appellant’s Privacy Act claims for damages because the claims are based on the assertion ‘that the VA’s failure to maintain accurate and complete records adversely affected [a veteran’s] benefits determinations.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henderson, Brown, Srinivasan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.