Hunt v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he statutory way of necessity exists only when the lands are being used or desired to be used for the purposes specified in the statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Blanton v. City of Pinellas Park
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-10-21· cited 46×
• Bennett v. Behring Corp.
  S.D. Florida· 1979-02-15· cited 36×
• Cox v. Glenbrook Company
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1962-05-17· cited 23×
• Point East One Condominium v. POINT EAST, ETC.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-06-28· cited 21×
• Roy v. Euro-Holland Vastgoed, BV
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-10-07· cited 17×
• Denton v. Denton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1962-12-07· cited 15×
• Groover v. Adiv Holding Company
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1967-09-12· cited 13×
• Cirelli v. Ent
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-18· cited 12×
• Joyner v. Andrews
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1962-02-21· cited 9×
• Perry v. Genung
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1964-04-17· cited 5×
• Florida State Board of Dispensing Opticians v. Bayne
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1967-11-08· cited 3×
• Staten v. Gonzalez-Falla
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-05-18

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• May v. Holley
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1952-06-17· cited 152×