Hunt v. Seeley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that non-sexual conduct can contribute to a sex-based hostile work environment if it would not have occurred but for the fact of the plaintiffs sex
• involving a certified class comprised of all African-American applicants for unskilled hourly employment with Ford from 1989 to the present who were excluded from unskilled employment with Ford in Ohio because they scored “low” on the unskilled pre-employment test
• “Plaintiffs cannot challenge the motion for summary judgment by relying on allegations contained in their complaint or on affidavits that merely state conclusory allegations.”
• criterion studies examine \whether performance on [a] test adequately correlates with performance on the job\
• a conclusory expert report is insufficient to defeat summary judgment
• “The Ohio courts have held that the evidentiary standards and burdens of proof applicable to a claimed violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 are likewise applicable in determining whether a violation of Ohio Rev. Code § 4112 has occurred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).