Skip to main content
· 3/18/1846

Hunt v. Palao

Citations

  • 45 U.S. 589
  • 11 L. Ed. 1115
  • 4 How. 589
  • 1846 U.S. LEXIS 416

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “it would be useless and vain for this court to issue a writ of error, and bring up the record, and proceed to judgment upon it, when, as the law now stands, no means or process is authorized by which our judgment could be executed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Taney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.