Skip to main content
· 10/14/2005

Hunt v. Lamb

Citations

  • 427 F.3d 725
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22199
  • 2005 WL 2600622

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where a district court lacks jurisdiction the only action it may take is to remand the improperly removed action
  • holding that a child custody case was not removable because, under the domestic relations exception, it could not have originally been filed in federal court even though the plaintiff alleged constitutional violations
  • holding that district court lacked jurisdiction over child-custody dispute
  • “It is well- established that federal courts lack jurisdiction over ‘[t]he whole subject of the domestic relations of husband and wife, [and] parent and child.’”
  • “It is well-established that federal courts lack jurisdiction over the whole subject of the domestic relations of husband and wife, and parent and child.”
  • “It is well-established that federal courts lack jurisdiction over the whole subject of the domestic relations of husband and wife, and parent and child.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ebel, Hartz, McCONNELL

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.