· 10/14/2005
Hunt v. Lamb
Citations
- 427 F.3d 725
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22199
- 2005 WL 2600622
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where a district court lacks jurisdiction the only action it may take is to remand the improperly removed action
- holding that a child custody case was not removable because, under the domestic relations exception, it could not have originally been filed in federal court even though the plaintiff alleged constitutional violations
- holding that district court lacked jurisdiction over child-custody dispute
- “It is well- established that federal courts lack jurisdiction over ‘[t]he whole subject of the domestic relations of husband and wife, [and] parent and child.’”
- “It is well-established that federal courts lack jurisdiction over the whole subject of the domestic relations of husband and wife, and parent and child.”
- “It is well-established that federal courts lack jurisdiction over the whole subject of the domestic relations of husband and wife, and parent and child.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ebel, Hartz, McCONNELL
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.