Hunt v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there is no duty to warn of a danger which is obvious or generally known
• holding that there is no duty to warn of a danger which is obvious or generally known
• motorcycle by its nature subjects rider to greater risk of injury than other forms of transportation
• motorcycle by its nature subjects rider to greater risk of injury than other forms of transportation
• no duty to warn of product-connected danger of which person who claims to be entitled to warning has actual knowledge
• the manufacturer is under no duty “to guard against injury from a patent peril or from a source manifestly dangerous”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).