Hunt v. Capitol Indemnity Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that negligence was not independent and distinct because “[w]ithout the underlying assault and battery, there would have been no injury and therefore no basis for plaintiffs’ action . . . for negligence”
• holding that negligence was not independent and distinct because “[w]ithout the underlying assault and battery, there would have been no injury and therefore no basis for plaintiffs’ action . . . for negligence”
• holding that negligence was not independent and distinct because “[w]ithout the underlying assault and battery, there would have been no injury and therefore no basis for plaintiffs’ action . . . for 17 negligence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).