Hunt Ridge at Tall Pines, Inc. v. Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing complaint based on third party beneficiary argument because it was not shown that both contracting parties intended to benefit third party homeowners.
• where an exhibit attached to the complaint contradicts allegations within the complaint, the plain language of the exhibit controls
• “Where complaint allegations are contradicted by exhibits attached to the complaint, the plain meaning of the exhibits control and may be the basis for a motion to dismiss.”
• “Where complaint allegations are contradicted by exhibits attached to the complaint, the plain meaning of the exhibits control and may be the basis for a motion to dismiss.”
• “To find the requisite intent, it must be shown that both contracting parties intended to benefit the third party; it is insufficient to show that only one party unilaterally intended to benefit the third party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).