· 9/1/1987
Hunt Investment Co. v. Eliot
Citations
- 742 P.2d 858
- 154 Ariz. 357
- 1987 Ariz. App. LEXIS 504
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the attorney could recover fees when he represented a partnership in which he owned a 4 PORTHOS v. PULITO Decision of the Court majority interest because he was acting for the benefit of others, as well as himself
- explaining that parties who represent themselves are not entitled to attorneys’ fees
- holding an attorney could recover fees when the attorney represented an investment partnership that could not represent itself but in which the attorney owned a majority interest because he was acting for the benefit of others and himself
- upholding the trial court’s use of the Schwartz factors to determine the amount of fees awarded
- lien purchasers risk possibility of redemption for opportunity to “benefit greatly”
- non-licensed attorney cannot represent other parties
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Greer, Grant, Froeb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.