Skip to main content
· 11/14/1919

Hunsaker's Admrx. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

Citations

  • 185 Ky. 686
  • 28 A.L.R. 117
  • 215 S.W. 552
  • 1919 Ky. LEXIS 359

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a case was not complex since the resolution required “straightforward application” of breach of contract principles and the case was disposed with “a relatively simple summary judgment Order.”
  • applying lodestar methodology to determine reasonableness of attorneys’ fees awarded pursuant to contract
  • “Courts faced with excessively vague or inadequate descriptions of tasks in fee claims have reduced fee claims by percentages ranging from 20% to 90%.”
  • the use of “except as set forth herein” referred the court to a remedy elsewhere in the contract and that this language was intentional and enforceable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.