· 10/16/2000
Hunnicutt v. Hawk
Citations
- 229 F.3d 997
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 25677
- 2000 WL 1528051
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because the Administrative Procedure Act does not apply to § 3621, we may not review whether the BOP erred in [the petitioner’s] particular case, but may only review whether the BOP exceeded its statutory authority....”
- “Because the Administrative Procedure Act does not apply to § 3621, we may not review whether the BOP erred in [the petitioner’s] particular case, but may only review whether the BOP exceeded its statutory authority. . . .”
- “Because the Administrative Procedure Act does not apply to § 3621, we may not review whether the BOP erred in [the petitioner’s] particular case, but may only review whether the BOP exceeded its statutory authority . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baldock, Kelly, Henry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.