Skip to main content
· 10/16/2000

Hunnicutt v. Hawk

Citations

  • 229 F.3d 997
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 25677
  • 2000 WL 1528051

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because the Administrative Procedure Act does not apply to § 3621, we may not review whether the BOP erred in [the petitioner’s] particular case, but may only review whether the BOP exceeded its statutory authority....”
  • “Because the Administrative Procedure Act does not apply to § 3621, we may not review whether the BOP erred in [the petitioner’s] particular case, but may only review whether the BOP exceeded its statutory authority. . . .”
  • “Because the Administrative Procedure Act does not apply to § 3621, we may not review whether the BOP erred in [the petitioner’s] particular case, but may only review whether the BOP exceeded its statutory authority . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baldock, Kelly, Henry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.