Hunnicutt Co. v. TJX Companies, Inc. (In Re Ames Department Stores, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “related to” jurisdiction existed over claims against a third-party defendant where the third-party defendant had an indemnification agreement with the debtor
• rejecting argument about de novo review where motions for summary judgment were fully briefed and pending before bankruptcy court
• considering whether the formulation in Turner was any different than that of Pacor and Cuyahoga Equipment, and concluding that “it is now clear that there is no difference”
• “the fact that the Plan is confirmed .is irrelevant in light of [possible effect on the bankruptcy estate].”
• potential drop in stock price relevant consideration
• positive effect on estate also satisfies requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).