Hungerford v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• [i]t is well established, moreover, that a notice of claim or the satisfaction of one of the . . . exceptions [contained in § 31-294c (c
• “[i]t is well established, moreover, that a notice of claim or the satisfaction of one of the . . . exceptions [contained in § 31-294c (c
• plaintiff precluded from obtaining survivor's benefits under General Statutes § 31-306 [a] because she failed to file notice of claim for compensation with decedent's employer or workers' compensation commissioner
• [i]t is well established, moreover, that a notice of claim or the satisfaction of one of the ... exceptions [contained in § 31-294c (c)] is a prerequisite that conditions whether the commission[er] has subject matter jurisdiction under the [Workers' Compensation Act]....
• [i]t is well established, moreover, that a notice of claim or the satisfaction of one of the . . . exceptions [contained in § 31-294c (c)] is a prerequisite that conditions whether the commissioner] has subject matter jurisdiction under the [Workers’ Compensation Act] . . . .
• “[i]t is well established, moreover, that a notice of claim or the satisfaction of one of the . . . exceptions [contained in § 31-294c (c)] is a prerequisite that conditions whether the commissioner] has subject matter jurisdiction under the [act]” [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).