Hundley Ex Rel. Estate Hundley v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff did not waive its inconsistency objection because it “repeatedly objected at trial to the proposed written interrogatory”
• stating that \police officers could not protect the public if tort law deterred them from approaching and detaining potentially violent suspects\
• stating that “police officers could not protect the public if tort law deterred them from approaching and detaining potentially violent suspects”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).