Humphrys v. Beach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[i]n the absence of evidence to the contrary, the court was entitled to draw the inference that the plaintiffs business would continue to be as profitable as it had been in the year and a half before the fire”
• award of $3500 for lost profits over one year and three months had sufficient support in record, namely, “evidence that the [plaintiffs] profit in 1955 was $3500, and that it was about half of that amount during the first half of 1956”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).