Humphreys v. Nissho American Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the Consumer Price Index constitutes ‘proper proof’ of increased cost of living” and can justify an increased EAJA attorney fee award
• concluding that “the Consumer Price Index constitutes ‘proper proof’ of increased cost of living” and can justify an increased EAJA attorney fee award
• concluding that “the Consumer Price Index constitutes ‘proper proof’ of increased cost of living” and can justify an increased EAJA attorney fee award
• holding that, “where . . . an EAJA petitioner presents uncontested proof of an increase in the cost of living sufficient to justify hourly attorney’s fees of more than [the applicable statutory amount at the time], enhanced fees should be awarded”
• holding that, “where . . . an EAJA petitioner presents uncontested proof of an increase in the cost of living sufficient to justify hourly attorney’s fees of more than [the applicable statutory amount at the time], enhanced fees should be awarded”
• stating that the Consumer Price Index constitutes proper proof of the increased cost of living and can justify an increased EAJA attorney fee award

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).