Humphreys v. Caldwell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an affidavit was legally insufficient because there was ―no representation whatsoever that the facts disclosed therein [were] true.‖
• holding that an affidavit was legally insufficient because there was “no representation whatsoever that the facts disclosed therein [were] true.”
• holding that an affidavit lacking attestation that the statements were based on personal knowledge was legally insufficient
• holding that an affidavit lacking attestation that the statements were based on personal knowledge was legally insufficient
• holding that an affidavit which does not positively and unqualifiedly represent the facts as disclosed in the affidavit to be true and within the affiant’s personal knowledge is legally insufficient
• holding that an affidavit showing no basis for personal knowledge is legally insufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).