Humphreys & Partners Architects v. Lessard Design, Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a “court may consider ... the content or substance of otherwise inadmissible materials where the ‘the party submitting the evidence show[s] that it will be possible to put the information ... into an admissible form.’ ” (alteration in original
• recognizing that a “court may consider... the content or substance of otherwise inadmissible materials when ‘the party submitting the evidence show[s] that it will be possible to put the information... into admissible form.’”
• recognizing that a “court may consider ... the content or substance of otherwise inadmissible materials where the ‘the party submitting the evidence show[s] that it will be possible to put the information ... into an admissible form.” (alteration in original
• recognizing that a “court may consider ... the content or substance of otherwise inadmissible materials where the ‘the party submitting the evidence show[s] that it will be possible to put the information ... into an admissible form.’ ” (alteration in original
• noting that a plaintiff cannot create a genuine dispute of fact by “build[ing] inference upon inference”
• recognizing that a “court may consider . . . the content or substance of otherwise inadmissible materials where the ‘the party submitting the evidence show[s] that it will be possible to put the information . . . into an admissible form.’” (alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).