Skip to main content
· 6/1/1923

Humphrey v. Neal

Citations

  • 199 Ky. 498
  • 251 S.W. 637
  • 1923 Ky. LEXIS 873

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distin- guishing Farez-Espinoza because the Government had “not suggested that it can detain [petitioner] at will’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moorman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.