Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2/22/2000
Humphrey v. Martin
Citations
- 755 So. 2d 551
- 2000 Miss. App. LEXIS 87
- 2000 WL 199828
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defense to contempt is an inability to obey order because it is vague or not sufficiently specific
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bridges, Diaz, Irving, King, Lee, McMillin, Moore, Payne, Southwick, Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- West v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1988-01-13· cited 257×
- Bredemeier v. JacksonMississippi Supreme Court· 1997-02-27· cited 232×
- Caldwell v. CaldwellMississippi Supreme Court· 1991-04-17· cited 117×
- Layne v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1989-03-29· cited 99×
- Mizell v. MizellMississippi Supreme Court· 1998-02-26· cited 92×
- Purvis v. PurvisMississippi Supreme Court· 1995-04-27· cited 86×
- Clements v. YoungMississippi Supreme Court· 1985-11-20· cited 62×
- Milam v. MilamMississippi Supreme Court· 1987-05-06· cited 56×
- Dunaway v. BusbinMississippi Supreme Court· 1986-11-26· cited 51×
- Switzer v. SwitzerMississippi Supreme Court· 1984-12-05· cited 51×
- Ivy v. MerchantMississippi Supreme Court· 1995-11-30· cited 49×
- Matthews v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1974-01-21· cited 24×
- Prestwood v. HambrickMississippi Supreme Court· 1975-02-17· cited 22×
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. EakinsMississippi Supreme Court· 1999-10-07· cited 15×
- In re ThomsonMississippi Supreme Court· 1995-11-30· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.