Humphrey v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing attorney’s conduct as “egregious” because, among other things, it reflected “a blatant disregard for his clients”
• imposing restitution as condition of reinstatement where “Respondent was repeatedly dishonest with his clients, courts, Bar Counsel and the Hearing Committee,” neglected client matters, and misappropriate $550
• disbarring an , attorney for intentional misappropriation of a client’s funds and continuing dishonesty
• disbarring an attorney for intentional misappropriation of 10 a client’s funds and continuing dishonesty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).