Skip to main content
· 6/23/1965

Hummell v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 211 A.2d 272
  • 100 R.I. 54
  • 1965 R.I. LEXIS 352

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[substantial authority supports the proposition that one who testifies [in one proceeding] does not thereby waive the privilege of refusing to testify in some subsequent proceeding on the ground of self-incrimination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Condon, Roberts, Paolino, Powers, Joslin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.