Skip to main content

Hummel v. State

Citations

  • 782 So. 2d 450
  • 2001 WL 251972

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that scoresheet error does not require re-sentencing if sentence imposed could have been imposed under corrected scoresheet
  • holding that, if a person’s sentence imposed under an erroneous scoresheet could have been imposed under a corrected scoresheet without a departure, then that person is not entitled to resentenc-ing
  • holding that sentencing errors are harmless where a corrected scoresheet places the appellant in the same cell or where the appellant could have received the same sentence without a departure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.