Hummel v. City National Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that discharge in violation of public policy, retaliatory discharge, conspiracy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims were subject to the TIA’s one-year bar
• dismissing plaintiff’s procedural due process claim where she “makes conclusory allegations that it was a “sham hearing” but does not allege sufficient facts to support that she did not receive an adequate hearing.”
• “[Plaintiff] makes conclusory allegations that it was a ‘sham hearing,’ but does not allege sufficient facts to support that she did not receive an adequate hearing.”
• applying one-year statute of limitations to retaliatory discharge claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).