Skip to main content
· 3/26/1984

Humke v. Taylor

Citations

  • 282 Ark. 94
  • 666 S.W.2d 394
  • 1984 Ark. LEXIS 1589

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “going and coming” rule did not apply to tax auditor whose work required him to travel to taxpayers’ places of business and to work as many hours as necessary to complete the audit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.