Hume v. Bowie
Citations
- 148 U.S. 245
- 13 S. Ct. 582
- 37 L. Ed. 438
- 1893 U.S. LEXIS 2227
Syllabus
<p>When the parties to a suit tried in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, at circuit, cannot agree as to the exceptions, the trial term may, under the rules, be extended into the succeeding term for the purpose of settling them; and in case the judge presiding at the trial dies without settling them, and in consequence thereof a motion be made to set aside the verdict and order a new trial, the then presiding judge in the Circuit Court may order the motion to be heard in General Term; and an order to set aside the verdict and direct a new trial made in General Term is not a final judgment from which an appeal may be taken to this court.</p>
Judges: Ciiiee, Fuller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court· 1940-12-09· cited 731×
- United States v. MayerSupreme Court· 1914-11-16· cited 500×
- United States v. Ersel StollingsFourth Circuit· 1975-06-05· cited 85×
- Deering v. QuiveyOregon Supreme Court· 1895-01-14· cited 57×
- Mohonk Realty Corporation v. Wise Shoe StoresSecond Circuit· 1940-04-15· cited 53×
- City of Manning v. German Ins.Eighth Circuit· 1901-03-11· cited 42×
- Farris v. Interstate Circuit, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1941-01-03· cited 38×
- Richardson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1907-05-01· cited 38×
- Gilmore v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1942-12-14· cited 35×
- Carmichael v. CarmichaelOregon Supreme Court· 1921-07-19· cited 32×
- Binder v. Commercial Travelers Mut. Acc. Ass'n of AmericaSecond Circuit· 1948-01-15· cited 31×
- Ex parte HarlanUnited States Circuit Court for the Northern District of Florida· 1909-11-01· cited 28×
- United States v. Joseph E. KrohnFifth Circuit· 1983-03-21· cited 27×
- Henrichsen v. SmithOregon Supreme Court· 1896-11-18· cited 25×
- Jones v. McClaughrySupreme Court of Iowa· 1915-02-26· cited 25×
- Sears v. DunbarOregon Supreme Court· 1907-07-30· cited 24×
- Weilbacher v. J. H. Winchester & Co., IncSecond Circuit· 1952-06-06· cited 23×
- Brooks v. National Shawmut BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1949-02-08· cited 23×
- St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. HenwoodEighth Circuit· 1946-10-22· cited 20×
- Cudahy Packing Co. v. City of OmahaEighth Circuit· 1928-01-10· cited 19×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- The Chateaugay Ore & Iron Co.Supreme Court· 1888-12-10· cited 103×
- LIFE AND FIRE INS. COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. Wilson's HeirsSupreme Court· 1834-02-18· cited 87×
- Mueller v. EhlersSupreme Court· 1876-01-10· cited 82×
- Metropolitan Railroad v. MooreSupreme Court· 1887-05-02· cited 68×
- Borrowscale v. BosworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1867-11-15· cited 28×
- Ormsby v. WebbSupreme Court· 1890-03-03· cited 23×
- Dredge v. ForsythSupreme Court· 1862-12-15· cited 19×
- State ex rel. Samuel v. WeiskittleCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1883-12-13· cited 19×
- Rice v. SangerSupreme Court· 1892-03-28· cited 14×
- Baker v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1876-01-17· cited 12×
- Brown v. BaxterSupreme Court· 1892-12-19· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.